Theory of Change
When launched in 2012, the Mitigation Action Facility, formerly known as the NAMA Facility, was instrumental in establishing the concept of ‘transformational change’. The concept has gained further momentum with the operationalisation of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and is equally applied in the Paris Agreement. The Mitigation Action Facility continues its focus on catalysing transformational change towards sustainable carbon-neutral development, supporting the Paris Agreement’s objective to limit the increase in global average temperature ‘to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels’.
The Mitigation Action Facility emphasises how a mix of different types of interventions – in particular, regulatory and financial ones – may trigger behaviour, consumption and production methods in developing countries that are conducive to carbon-neutral development. Mitigation Action Facility support enables public and private actors in developing countries and emerging economies to address financial barriers to behaviour change, consumption and production patterns, and the use of carbon-neutral technologies. The project portfolio demonstrates that across the various sectors, carbon-neutral technologies can become economically viable and thus encourage and facilitate further investments in broader mitigation measures within a sector.
The Theory of Change (ToC) seeks to illustrate the transformational potential by depicting the pathway of changes that shall be initiated through the Mitigation Action Facility support. These desired changes are primarily triggered by the individual projects. Projects shall demonstrate how climate finance will effectively contribute to a transformational change. Given the Mitigation Action Facility’s objective of supporting implementation of ambitious mitigation measures to drive decarbonisation in priority sectors, the focus of projects is on financial support mechanisms that serve to mobilise capital investments in and operation of carbon-neutral alternatives. Technical support and institutional and regulatory capacity development in partner countries may be provided during project implementation to facilitate this objective. The underlying assumptions behind the ToC can be found in the supporting narrative document. The ToC is divided into impact, outcome, outputs, activities and inputs, as shown below:
Impact
Large-scale, long-term reductions in GHG emissions and the structural transformation of economies and societies towards carbon neutrality contribute to the global goal of limiting the temperature rise to 1.5°C
Outcome
The Mitigation Action Facility demonstrates that climate finance can effectively drive transformational change in partner countries by advancing NDC implementation, reducing GHG emissions, and promoting carbon-neutral development pathways
Intermediate Outcomes
Intermediate Outcome 1
Broadened political
commitment
to carbon-neutral
development
pathway
Intermediate Outcome 2
Market
transformation
Intermediate Outcome 3
Increased finance
accessibility
Intermediate Outcome 4
Improved policy,
legislative,
and regulatory
frameworks
Intermediate Outcome 5
Increased
institutional
capacity
to implement
mitigation action
Intermediate Outcome 6
Carbon-neutral,
sustainable
approaches
and instruments
are scaled
Outputs
Output 1
Transformational mitigation to support the achievement of targets outlined in NDCs
Output 2
Public and private finance leveraged to drive carbon-neutral development
Output 3
Lessons learnt inform and enhance the Mitigation Action Facility’s overall performance
Output 4
National and local stakeholders apply strengthened capacities and policy frameworks to implement mitigation actions
Output 5
Projects deliver measurable, sustainable, and inclusive development co-benefits
Activities
Programme activities
- Pipeline development and project selection
- Portfolio coordination and donor engagement
- Project support and oversight
- Strategic partnerships and outreach
Project activities
- Project activities implemented by selected IOs constitute the primary delivery mechanism for mitigation solutions
- Projects are tailored to national contexts and designed to demonstrate scalable solutions
Cross-cutting activities
- Monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL)
- Knowledge management
- Communication and dissemination
- Replication and systemic learning
Inputs
Operational Inputs
- Mitigation Action Facility-funded projects
- Technical Support Unit (TSU)
- Advisory Committee
Contextual Inputs
- Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
- National policies and long-term strategies
- Existing mitigation initiatives and sectoral experience
Foundational Assumptions
- Donor support is sustained
- TSU functions effectively and efficiently
- Projects are designed and implemented in line with national priorities
- Knowledge and learning are systematically integrated